Hurry a conclusion of DVD standardization.

Hurry a conclusion of DVD standardization, and united negotiations of the Sony camp and the Toshiba camp reach a deadlock to know. I will describe my conclusion. The one that negotiating between companies expect is strange. There is not a hand except that the government starts it if I came to here.
When I produce video recording reproduction planes of blue laser method for general families by administrative advice, oblige it to the deployment of a reproduction function of both standards.
I come for a stage of here, and standardization of both (the Sony camp and the Toshiba camp) is an aspect of impossibility. In addition, say that it is expected that standardization loses a characteristic of both is right so that both insist.
There is only choice one which was left so. A video recording function does not mind that I adopt all standards, but there are not the others that only a reproduction function can be accompanied by duty so that there is reproduction of both standards. If there is reproduction of both standards only by reproduction, inconvenience of a consumer is solved.
It is my expectation, but, as for the movie industry, adoption of Toshiba method is convincing. A reason is almost satisfied with capacity of Toshiba method to record a high definition TV movie. On the contrary, capacity remains and is uneconomical when it is Sony method. In addition, it is a little trouble in simplicity costs increase for a cassette method, and to treat, but, in the case of Sony method, the reason is because there is it.
In addition, it is convenient when I buy a blue laser DVD video recording machine when I can play DVD of old regulations case if it was possible. In this case one of Toshiba method is convenient. Record re-が of old and new DVD is possible in one slot as possibility. I have to make it two slots to revitalize old DVD with a machine of the Sony camp. It is from a weak point of a cassette method.
And a guidance period is enough only in a thing of around 5 when the government does administrative advice. Because the situation will be fixed whether a standard of which camp holds leadership if 5 rises.
In addition, become serious if oblige it to the reproduction deployment of both standards by administrative advice and both of circumstances think that neitherneither of talks to be good.
Even if I am discontent for both camp, I cannot but accept this plan for a consumer.
Reference materials "Merit and demirit of both"
Now two kinds of methods are proposed in a blue laser DVD standard like agreement. It is already manufactured, and one kind is selling it. A record method makes a little difference, and these two kinds of standards are only differences of depth of merely ditch.
Deep one (a HD method) has video recording time for about 2 hours (normal mode 19GB) with high definition TV television by the method that the Toshiba camp leads. Three levels type is developed recently, too, and approximately 50% record capacity increases. Diversion of existing facilities is possible, and it is an advantage on a cost side, but there is a plant.
The method how the Sony camp leads shallow one (a blue lei method). I have record time (47GB) for about several hours. The method how a ditch is shallow judging from record capacity is overwhelmingly advantageous. However, because it is a cassette method, there is not compatibility with existing DVD at all, and is increase in cost a space?